Norstugan

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Norway
  • Oslo
  • Norway Politics
  • Norway Culture
  • Norway Economy

Norstugan

Header Banner

Norstugan

  • Home
  • Norway
  • Oslo
  • Norway Politics
  • Norway Culture
  • Norway Economy
Norway Politics
Home›Norway Politics›Australia and Norway were once tied in the global anti-corruption rankings. Now we’re heading in opposite directions

Australia and Norway were once tied in the global anti-corruption rankings. Now we’re heading in opposite directions

By Chavarria Mary
January 25, 2022
0
0

In a worrying sign, Australia has fallen in Transparency International’s latest Corruption Perceptions Index – the world’s most widely cited ranking of how clean or corrupt each country’s public sector is.

In the 2021 index released today, Australia repeated its biggest annual decline on record – falling four points on a 100-point scale from 77 to 73. Zero is considered highly corrupt, while a score of 100 is very clean.

Overall, Australia has lost 12 points on the index since 2012, more than any OECD country except Hungary, which also lost 12 points. Australia’s rate of decline is also similar or faster than other countries with far worse problems, including Cyprus, Lebanon, Syria and Venezuela.

Australia was ranked seventh in the world in 2012, tied with Norway. This year, Australia has fallen to 18th out of 180 countries. By contrast, Norway’s global position improved from seventh to fourth place in the index.

It is a clear sign that Australia has missed a huge chance to fix its failing anti-corruption reputation. And that will likely continue to decline unless integrity policies are reversed in this year’s federal election.


Author provided

What the index shows

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) is compiled annually by Transparency International using the world’s most credible, independent and long-term measures of corruption. Sources include the Economist Intelligence Unit, Freedom House, the World Justice Project and the World Bank.

These surveys focus on levels of corruption in the public sector, as well as the strength of mechanisms to prevent and control corruption. This makes the index not only a list of more or less corrupt countries, but also an assessment of their current anti-corruption efforts.

The CPI is recognized as a key indicator of Australia’s integrity performance, not just by reform advocates, but by the federal government itself.



Read more: As a NSW prime minister falls and SA empties its anti-corruption commission, what are the lessons for integrity bodies in Australia?


In September 2018, then-Attorney General Christian Porter tried to defend the country’s anti-corruption record, telling parliament that the CPI had placed Australia “consistently in the top 20 countries in the world for low corruption”.

It took Central Alliance MP Rebekha Sharkie to point out that Australia was not just in the top 20, but in the top ten.

Instead of maintaining their high score, like Norway, Australia have gone the other way – and they are now in danger of dropping out of the top 20 altogether.


Author provided

Australia had the chance to stem the fall

Prior to this year, Australia’s score on the index stabilized as the federal government finally committed to addressing integrity issues and other efforts to root out corruption took place.

During this period, there was hope that things might change:

  • corrupt politicians and officials have been successfully convicted in several states (including NSW’s prosecution of former ministers Eddie Obeid and Ian Macdonald, while action has been taken against local government corruption in Queensland)
Former Labor Minister Eddie Obeid.
Former Labor Minister Eddie Obeid was sentenced last year to seven years in prison for a rigged mining tender.
Bianca de Marchi/AAP
  • after many years, the major parties finally committed to setting up a federal integrity commission (Labour in February 2018 and the Coalition in December 2018)

  • long-awaited legislation has been introduced in parliament to strengthen laws against bribery of foreign public officials

  • bipartisan recommendations have been made to strengthen whistleblower protections, with new whistleblower laws in the private sector and promises of reform for the federal public sector

  • High-profile federal enforcement action has been taken against money laundering through Australian banks, while growing evidence of money laundering in casinos and real estate has raised hopes for a new reform.

But last year progress stalled

The latest drop in the CPI shows that business and expert confidence in Australia’s official responses to corruption has plummeted again.

Since 2020, when this year’s index data was mostly collected, the expected progress has not occurred. Instead, Australia saw:

Bridget McKenzie during the investigation into the
Bridget McKenzie quit the front bench and resigned as assistant national championships chief after the so-called ‘sporting rorts’ case.
Mick Tsikas/AAP
New South Wales Premier Gladys Berejiklian announces resignation
New South Wales Premier Gladys Berejiklian announced her resignation last October.
Bianca de Marchi/AAP

Why leadership is essential

It doesn’t have to be that way. Transparency International used this year’s global index to highlight the need for countries to improve checks and balances through strong integrity institutions and uphold people’s right to hold those in power to account.

When countries show serious leadership in anti-corruption reform – such as the UK under the Conservative government of David Cameron from 2012 to 2017 – their scores on the index can climb.

Clearly, the world now fears that this type of leadership is lacking in Australia.

Priorities and potential solutions are increasingly understood by experts, observers and the community. For example, Griffith University and Transparency International Australia recently assessed Australia’s national integrity system and developed a plan for reform to follow.

With the 2022 federal election just months away, the quality of party anti-corruption commitments — and the willingness of leaders to implement them — will matter more than ever.

Key questions are still unanswered. As recently as November, the Prime Minister and Attorney General revealed they were shelving any improvements to their Commonwealth Integrity Commission plan.

The announcement came despite the government spending another year consulting over obvious problems with the plan.



Read more: Explained: What is the proposed Commonwealth Integrity Commission and how would it work?


Anti-corruption reform is no longer the “fringe issue”, Prime Minister Scott Morrison claimed several years ago.

For confidence in Australia’s public integrity to improve, the winner of the election will have to promise – and deliver – more convincing solutions than we have seen in the past two years.

Related posts:

  1. Biden’s White House releases first-ever US strategy against domestic terrorism
  2. Highlights on Aung San Suu Kyi
  3. Norway, we must talk about racism
  4. Indian funds in Swiss banks reach over Rs 20,000 crore

Recent Posts

  • GlobalFact 9 launches in Norway with a big question: how does fact-checking help?
  • Norway 2022: Energy Policy Review – Event
  • New Flights to Oslo, Norway from Fort Lauderdale Airport
  • How Europe became so dependent on Putin for its gas
  • In the saddle: six of the best EuroVelo routes to explore by bike this summer

Categories

  • Norway
  • Norway Culture
  • Norway Economy
  • Norway Politics
  • Oslo

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions